1
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 or 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For Quarter Ended June 30, 1999 Commission File Number 1-3761
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
------------------------------------------------------
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 75-0289970
- ------------------------ ------------------------------------
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
8505 Forest Lane, P.O. Box 660199, Dallas, Texas 75266-0199
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code 972-995-3773
---------------------------------------------------------------
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
--- ---
392,832,728
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of shares of Registrant's common stock outstanding as of June 30, 1999
2
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Financial Statements
(In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts.)
For Three Months Ended For Six Months Ended
---------------------- ---------------------
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
Income 1999 1998 1999 1998
------- ------- ------- -------
Net revenues............................................... $ 2,346 $ 2,167 $ 4,385 $ 4,353
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of revenues......................................... 1,197 1,442 2,307 2,958
Research and development................................. 359 306 666 634
Marketing, general and administrative.................... 336 457 659 821
------- ------- ------- -------
Total.................................................. 1,892 2,205 3,632 4,413
------- ------- ------- -------
Profit (loss) from operations.............................. 454 (38) 753 (60)
Other income (expense) net................................. 65 135 143 193
Interest on loans.......................................... 19 18 37 37
------- ------- ------- -------
Income before provision for income taxes................... 500 79 859 96
Provision for income taxes................................. 177 27 292 33
------- ------- ------- -------
Net income................................................. $ 323 $ 52 $ 567 $ 63
======= ======= ======= =======
Diluted earnings per common share.......................... $ .80 $ .13 $ 1.40 $ .16
======= ======= ======= =======
Basic earnings per common share............................ $ .82 $ .13 $ 1.45 $ .16
======= ======= ======= =======
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock.......... $ .085 $ .085 $ .17 $ .085
Cash Flows
Net cash provided by operating activities.............................................. $ 526 $ 264
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment........................................... (505) (698)
Purchases of short-term investments.................................................. (970) (664)
Sales and maturities of short-term investments....................................... 1,260 1,528
Sales of noncurrent investments ..................................................... 172 --
Acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired...................................... (382) (152)
Proceeds from sale of businesses..................................................... -- 120
------- -------
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.................................... (425) 134
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on loans payable............................................................ -- (4)
Payments on long-term debt........................................................... (51) (38)
Dividends paid on common stock....................................................... (67) (66)
Sales and other common stock transactions............................................ 170 63
Common stock repurchase program...................................................... (321) (97)
------- -------
Net cash used in financing activities.................................................. (269) (142)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash................................................ (38) 2
------- -------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents................................... (206) 258
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1................................................... 540 1,015
------- -------
Cash and cash equivalents, June 30..................................................... $ 334 $ 1,273
======= =======
2
3
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Financial Statements
(In millions of dollars, except per-share amounts.)
June 30 Dec. 31
Balance Sheet 1999 1998
------- -------
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.......................................... $ 334 $ 540
Short-term investments............................................. 1,409 1,709
Accounts receivable, less allowance for losses of
$61 million in 1999 and $70 million in 1998...................... 1,749 1,343
Inventories:
Raw materials.................................................... 89 77
Work in process.................................................. 380 354
Finished goods................................................... 220 165
------- -------
Inventories.................................................... 689 596
------- -------
Prepaid expenses................................................... 87 75
Deferred income taxes.............................................. 553 583
------- -------
Total current assets............................................. 4,821 4,846
------- -------
Property, plant and equipment at cost................................ 6,626 6,379
Less accumulated depreciation...................................... (3,219) (3,006)
------- -------
Property, plant and equipment (net).............................. 3,407 3,373
------- -------
Investments.......................................................... 1,987 2,564
Deferred income taxes................................................ 38 23
Other assets......................................................... 794 444
------- -------
Total assets......................................................... $11,047 $11,250
======= =======
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current liabilities:
Loans payable and current portion long-term debt................... $ 263 $ 267
Accounts payable................................................... 554 510
Accrued and other current liabilities.............................. 1,261 1,419
------- -------
Total current liabilities........................................ 2,078 2,196
------- -------
Long-term debt....................................................... 960 1,027
Accrued retirement costs............................................. 776 895
Deferred income taxes................................................ 264 381
Deferred credits and other liabilities............................... 248 224
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock, $25 par value. Authorized - 10,000,000 shares.
Participating cumulative preferred. None issued.................. -- --
Common stock, $1 par value. Authorized - 1,200,000,000 shares.
Shares issued: 1999 - 393,801,640; 1998 - 392,395,997............ 394 392
Paid-in capital.................................................... 1,010 1,178
Retained earnings.................................................. 5,295 4,795
Less treasury common stock at cost.
Shares: 1999 - 968,912; 1998 - 1,716,038......................... (108) (134)
Accumulated other comprehensive income............................. 130 296
------- -------
Total stockholders' equity....................................... 6,721 6,527
------- -------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........................... $11,047 $11,250
======= =======
3
4
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Diluted earnings per common share are based on average common and dilutive
potential common shares outstanding (406.1 and 401.9 million shares for the
second quarters of 1999 and 1998, and 405.2 and 400.8 million shares for the six
months ended June 30, 1999 and 1998).
2. On July 25, 1999, TI entered into an agreement to purchase Unitrode
Corporation, in a stock-for-stock transaction pursuant to which TI will issue
approximately 8.9 million shares of common stock, valued at approximately $1.2
billion as of July 23, 1999.
3. On May 29, 1999, TI entered into an agreement to purchase Telogy Networks,
Inc. in a stock-for-stock transaction pursuant to which TI will issue
approximately 4.1 million shares of common stock, valued at approximately $435
million as of June 1, 1999.
4. In connection with TI's acquisition of Libit Signal Processing Ltd. (Libit)
for approximately $365 million in the second quarter of 1999, TI recorded a
charge of $52 million for the value of purchased in-process R&D (purchased R&D)
at the acquisition date, based upon the appraised value of the related
developmental projects. The purchased R&D projects were assessed, analyzed and
valued within the context and framework articulated by the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
Libit's research and development relates to silicon solutions and complex system
level internet telephony software used in cable modems, cable set-top boxes,
cable head-ends and digital television products, which empower high-speed
internet access.
Significant assumptions used in determining the value of purchased R&D for Libit
included projected operating cash flows and the discount rate. Projected
operating cash flows were expected to begin in 2000. The discount rate selected
for Libit's in-process technologies was 22%.
At the time of the acquisition, June 30, 1999, Libit management estimated the
remaining cost and time to complete the purchased R&D projects was $5 million
and 492 engineer-months. The term "engineer-month" refers to the average amount
of research work expected to be performed by an engineer in a month. TI expects
to essentially meet its original return expectations.
The relative stage of completion and projected operating cash flows of the
underlying in-process projects acquired were the most significant and uncertain
assumptions utilized in the valuation analysis of the in-process research and
development. Such uncertainties could give rise to unforeseen budget over-runs
and/or revenue shortfalls in the event that TI is unable to successfully
complete and commercialize the projects. TI management is primarily responsible
for estimating the value of the purchased R&D in all acquisitions accounted for
under the purchase method.
5. In the second quarter of 1999, the FASB issued SFAS No. 137 which deferred
the effective date of SFAS No. 133 (accounting for derivatives) from 2000 to
2001. In addition, SFAS No. 137 rolled forward the transition date for the
required separation for accounting purposes of an embedded derivative from its
host instrument. The previous transition date was for host instruments acquired
after year-end 1997. The new transition date is for host instruments acquired
after year-end 1998. As a result of these changes, TI expects to adopt SFAS No.
133 in the first quarter of 2001 on a cumulative basis. TI's significant
embedded derivative, the embedded call option on Micron Technology, Inc.
(Micron) common shares contained in the company's Micron convertible note
investment, will not be separated from the convertible note because the note was
acquired prior to year-end 1998.
6. In the second quarter of 1999, TI reassessed its accounting for its
investment in TI Ventures at the fund's aggregate fair value. The company has
concluded that accounting for the fund based on its investment in each
individual portfolio company is more consistent with TI's current investment
objectives. Accordingly, unrealized gains and losses related to changes in the
fund's aggregate fair value will no longer be reflected in other income
4
5
and expense, instead, changes in individual fair value of these available-
for-sale securities will be recorded as an increase or decrease in
stockholders' equity. The effect of this change is not significant.
7. In the first quarter of 1999, the company announced a consolidation of
semiconductor manufacturing operations in Japan to improve manufacturing
efficiencies and reduce costs. The consolidation is expected to be completed by
the end of the year 2000. The action resulted in a pretax charge of $14 million
in the first quarter, of which $13 million was for severance for the elimination
of 153 jobs in Hatogaya, Japan and $1 million for other related costs. At June
30, 1999, the pay-out of the severance cost obligation had not yet begun. Of the
$14 million charge, $11 million was included in cost of revenues and $3 million
in marketing, general and administrative expense.
8. In the first quarter of 1999, sale of the Micron subordinated note and other
securities generated $172 million in cash.
9. In connection with TI's acquisition of Butterfly VLSI, Ltd. (Butterfly) in
the first quarter of 1999, TI recorded a charge of $10 million for the value of
purchased in-process R&D (purchased R&D) at the acquisition date, based upon the
appraised value of the related developmental projects. The purchased R&D
projects were assessed, analyzed and valued within the context and framework
articulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Butterfly's research and development relates to short distance wireless
semiconductor and systems technology. This technology is used to achieve higher
data rates at 2.4 GHz and above frequencies for use in voice-plus-data
transmission products.
Significant assumptions used in determining the value of purchased R&D for
Butterfly included projected operating cash flows and the discount rate.
Projected operating cash flows were expected to begin in 2000. The discount rate
selected for Butterfly's in-process technologies was 25%.
At the time of the acquisition, Butterfly management estimated the remaining
cost and time to complete the purchased R&D projects to be $5 million and 264
engineer-months. The term "engineer-month" refers to the average amount of
research work expected to be performed by an engineer in a month. At June 30,
1999, based on the latest available information, the estimated cost and time to
complete the in-process projects was approximately $8 million and 575
engineer-months. TI expects to essentially meet its original return
expectations.
The relative stage of completion and projected operating cash flows of the
underlying in-process projects acquired were the most significant and uncertain
assumptions utilized in the valuation analysis of the in-process research and
development. Such uncertainties could give rise to unforeseen budget over-runs
and/or revenue shortfalls in the event that TI is unable to successfully
complete and commercialize the projects. TI management is primarily responsible
for estimating the value of the purchased R&D in all acquisitions accounted for
under the purchase method.
10. In the second quarter of 1998, the company announced that, as a result of
the various business divestitures over the past several years, the pending sale
of its memory business (subsequently completed in September 1998), and weakness
at that time in the semiconductor market environment, it was implementing a
severance/manufacturing efficiency program in order to more closely match the
size and cost of its support functions with the company's overall size and to
further combine manufacturing resources for more efficient operations. The
program, which primarily affected the company's corporate
5
6
activities and semiconductor businesses, included the elimination of 3,441 jobs
around the world through voluntary programs, attrition, outsourcing and layoffs,
as well as the closing of several facilities. As a result, the company took a
pretax charge of $219 million in the second quarter of 1998, of which $126
million was included in marketing, general and administrative expense and $93
million in cost of revenues. Of the $219 million charge, $161 million was for
severance, $41 million for asset write-downs and $17 million for vendor
cancellation and lease charges.
Of the $41 million for asset write-downs, $25 million was for U.S. semiconductor
inventories and $16 million was for fixed assets, primarily accelerated
depreciation on assets phased out during 1998 in connection with the winding
down of production at a semiconductor manufacturing facility located in
Singapore.
Of the $17 million for vendor cancellation and lease charges, $15 million was
for required vendor fees for cancellation of purchase contracts for chemicals,
supplies and equipment as a result of a U.S. facility shutdown.
At June 30, 1999, the program had essentially been completed, with most
severance costs paid except for $22 million, which will primarily be paid by the
end of 1999. Of the 3,441 jobs, 3,381 had been eliminated, and 60 will be
eliminated by the end of 1999.
11. In the second quarter of 1998, the company sold its shares in the TI-Acer
DRAM semiconductor manufacturing joint venture to Acer Corporation for $120
million in cash. This sale resulted in a pretax gain of $83 million, included
in other income.
12. In the first quarter of 1998, the company's U.S. DRAM semiconductor
manufacturing joint venture with Hitachi, Ltd. was discontinued as a result of a
combination of severe price declines and overcapacity in the DRAM market. As a
part of this first quarter discontinuance, TI purchased the assets of the
venture for approximately $98 million. Also as part of this first quarter
discontinuance, TI and Hitachi decided to assume and share equally in the
payment of the venture's obligations. TI's share of those payments was $219
million, which was paid and charged to cost of revenues in the first quarter.
13. In connection with TI's acquisitions of GO DSP and Spectron, both of which
occurred in the first quarter of 1998, TI recorded charges of $10 million and
$15 million, for purchased in-process R&D (purchased R&D), based upon the
appraised value of the related developmental projects. The Income Approach,
which included an analysis of the markets, cash flows, and risks associated with
achieving such cash flows, was the primary technique utilized in valuing each
purchased R&D project.
GO DSP's and Spectron's research and development related to DSP software tools.
These software tools, which include real-time operating systems (RTOS), allow
DSP systems developers to improve productivity and reduce time-to-market. TI's
goal in these acquisitions was to extend its leadership in digital signal
processing solutions by offering a complete development environment, simplifying
DSP development, and making TI DSP solutions more attractive for a broad range
of fast-growing markets.
Significant assumptions used in determining the value of purchased R&D for GO
DSP and Spectron included projected operating cash flows and the discount rate.
Projected operating cash flows were expected to begin in late 1998. The discount
rate selected for GO DSP's and Spectron's in-process technologies was 30%.
6
7
At the time of the acquisitions, GO DSP and Spectron management estimated the
remaining cost and time to complete the purchased R&D projects was approximately
$7 million and 540 engineer-months. The term "engineer-month" refers to the
average amount of research work expected to be performed by an engineer in a
month. All the in-process projects were essentially completed on schedule. TI
expects to essentially meet its original return expectations.
The relative stage of completion and projected operating cash flows of the
underlying in-process projects acquired were the most significant and uncertain
assumptions utilized in the valuation analysis of the in-process research and
development. Uncertainties regarding projected operating cash flows could give
rise to unforeseen budget over-runs and/or revenue shortfalls in the event that
TI is unable to successfully commercialize the projects. TI management is
primarily responsible for estimating the value of the purchased R&D in all
acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method.
14. Total comprehensive income, i.e., net income plus investment and pension
liability adjustments to stockholders' equity, for the second quarters of 1999
and 1998 was $147 million and $67 million. For the six months ended June 30,
1999 and 1998, it was $401 million and $71 million.
15. There has been no significant change in the status of the audit and
investigation concerning grants from the Italian government.
The amount of borrowings by TECH Semiconductor Singapore under its $450 million
principal amount credit facility, of which TI is a guarantor, was $365 million
at June 30, 1999, compared to $240 million at year-end 1998.
16. Certain amounts in the prior period's financial statements have been
reclassified to conform to the 1999 presentation.
17. The statements of income, statements of cash flows and balance sheet at June
30, 1999, are not audited but reflect all adjustments which are of a normal
recurring nature and are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair
statement of the results of the periods shown.
7
8
18. Business segment information is as follows:
For Three Months Ended For Six Months Ended
---------------------- --------------------
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
Business Segment Net Revenues 1999 1998 1999 1998
(millions of dollars) ------- ------- ------- -------
Semiconductor
Trade ..................................... $ 1,880 $ 1,530 $ 3,544 $ 3,123
Intersegment .............................. 3 5 12 10
------- ------- ------- -------
1,883 1,535 3,556 3,133
------- ------- ------- -------
Materials & Controls
Trade ..................................... 256 245 502 487
Intersegment .............................. -- -- -- --
------- ------- ------- -------
256 245 502 487
------- ------- ------- -------
Educational & Productivity Solutions
Trade ..................................... 153 165 234 240
Corporate activities ........................ 40 45 62 93
Divested activities ......................... 14 177 31 400
------- ------- ------- -------
Total ....................................... $ 2,346 $ 2,167 $ 4,385 $ 4,353
======= ======= ======= =======
Business Segment Profit (Loss)
(millions of dollars)
Semiconductor ............................... $ 485 $ 382 $ 824 $ 740
Materials & Controls ........................ 42 37 83 73
Educational & Productivity Solutions ........ 43 37 53 38
Corporate activities ........................ (81) (53) (155) (97)
Special charges and gains,
net of applicable profit sharing .......... (45) (136) (70) (380)
Interest on loans/other income,
excluding a second quarter 1998 gain of
$83 million included above ................ 45 34 105 73
Divested activities ......................... 11 (222) 19 (351)
------- ------- ------- -------
Income before provision for income taxes .... $ 500 $ 79 $ 859 $ 96
======= ======= ======= =======
8
9
19. The following is a detailed reconciliation of individual restructuring
accruals (in millions of dollars).
YEAR OF CHARGE
1997 1998 1999
------------------------------------ -------------------- ----------
Divestiture Reserves SC
of MCB/ M&C cost against operation SC
termina reduc gains on SC and closing & operation
-tion -tion business Corp. M&C sale of closing in
Description* Total of DIPD action sales actions operation Japan
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BALANCE
DECEMBER 31,1998 $ 163 $ 16 $ 21 $ 24 $ 49 $ 53
CHARGES:
Severance 13 $ 13
Vendor and warranty
obligations 1 1
DISPOSITIONS:
Severance payments (41) (4) (1) (16) (20)
Vendor and warranty
obligation payments (1) (1)
Adjustments - net
reversal to income (3) (3)
----- ---- --- ---- ---- ---- ----
BALANCE,
MARCH 31,1999 132 15 17 23 30 33 14
DISPOSITIONS:
Severance payments (9) (3) (5) (1)
Various payments (8) (8)
Adjustments - net
reversal to income (5) (2) (3)
---- ---- --- --- ---- ---- ----
BALANCE,
JUNE 30,1999 $ 110 $ 15 $ 12 $ 23 $ 22 $ 24 $ 14
===== ==== ==== ==== ==== ==== ====
*Abbreviations
SC = Semiconductor Business
MCB = Mobile Computing Business
DIPD = Digital Imaging Printing Development Program
Corp. = Corporate Division
9
10
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations.
The Registrant (the "company" or "TI") reported second quarter 1999 financial
results which included profit from operations (PFO) of $454 million, leading to
an operating margin of 19.4 percent compared to a loss from operations of $38
million in the year-ago quarter. Operating margin was up 4.7 percentage points
from the first quarter of 1999. TI earnings per share (EPS) increased to $0.80,
up $0.67 from the second quarter of 1998, and up $0.20 from the first quarter of
1999.
NOTE: A two-for-one stock split in the form of a 100 percent stock dividend,
payable on August 16, 1999, was announced on July 15, 1999. The EPS amounts in
this report were calculated on a pre-split basis.
TI's second quarter revenues include $85 million for catch-up royalties due
under a previously announced agreement with Hyundai Electronics Industries Co.,
which contributed about $0.12 EPS.
During the quarter, TI announced two acquisitions to support its strategy in the
rapidly emerging broadband communications market: Telogy Networks, Inc.,
bringing TI Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) software, and Libit Signal
Processing Ltd., providing cable modem chipsets. Coupled with TI's current
strengths in ADSL and programmable DSP, these acquisitions will expand TI's
presence into all areas of the broadband market.
TI also announced the acquisition of ATL Research A/S, bringing additional
state-of-the-art radio frequency skills to enhance the company's expertise in
next-generation wireless communications.
On July 25, 1999, TI entered into an agreement to purchase Unitrode Corporation,
a major designer and supplier of power management components, in a
stock-for-stock transaction pursuant to which TI will issue approximately 8.9
million shares of common stock, valued at approximately $1.2 billion as of July
23, 1999.
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
TI revenues for the second quarter of 1999 were $2346 million, up 8 percent from
second quarter 1998 revenues of $2167 million, as growth in semiconductor more
than offset the loss of revenue from the divested memory business. Revenues were
up 15 percent from the $2039 million of the first quarter of 1999, led by
increased shipments in semiconductor. Increased semiconductor royalties and
seasonal strength in the Educational & Productivity Solutions (E&PS) business
also contributed to the sequential revenue growth.
PFO for the quarter was $454 million, up $492 million from the year-ago quarter,
due about equally to the absence of losses from the now divested memory business
and the non-recurrence of a special charge associated with a worldwide
restructuring of support functions and consolidation of manufacturing
operations, and to a lesser extent, increased profits in semiconductor. PFO was
up 52 percent from the first quarter of 1999, primarily due to growth in
semiconductor, and to a lesser extent, seasonal strength in the E&PS business as
well as the non-recurrence of a special charge associated with the consolidation
of semiconductor manufacturing operations in Japan.
Income for the quarter was $323 million, up $271 million from the second quarter
of 1998, due about equally to the absence of losses from the now divested memory
business and the non-recurrence of a special charge associated with a worldwide
restructuring of support functions and consolidation of manufacturing
operations, and to a lesser extent, increased profits in semiconductor.
TI orders in the second quarter were $2507 million, up 30 percent from the
year-ago quarter, due to strength in semiconductor. Orders were up 12 percent
10
11
from the first quarter of 1999, due primarily to strength in semiconductor, and
to a lesser extent, seasonality in E&PS.
Results for the quarter include a special charge of $52 million for in-process
R&D associated with the previously announced acquisition of Libit Signal
Processing Ltd. In the year-ago quarter, there was a special charge of $219
million for a worldwide restructuring of support functions and consolidation of
manufacturing operations, as well as an $83 million gain in the quarter on the
sale of TI's shares in the TI-Acer joint venture to Acer Corporation. Results
for the first quarter of 1999 include special charges of $24 million. These
charges include $14 million related to the consolidation of semiconductor
manufacturing operations in Japan, and $10 million for purchased in-process
research and development associated with the previously announced acquisition of
Butterfly, VLSI, Ltd.
Excluding special items, PFO was $500 million, compared with $180 million in the
second quarter of 1998; income was $371 million, compared with $142 million; and
EPS was $0.91, compared with $0.35. The company believes that, for analytical
purposes, the effect of these items should be excluded from operating results
because they are not necessarily indicative of future operating results or of
future financial condition. Additional information relating to these items
appears below under the heading "Special Charges and Gains."
OUTLOOK
In line with the company's earlier expectations, TI anticipates continued growth
in its semiconductor business in the second half of the year, with revenues
increasing sequentially.
The wireless market is expected to continue to be strong, driven by an increase
in new subscribers and replacement rates. TI has raised its estimate for
industry sales of digital phones from 230 million to 245 million units this
year. TI expects continued strength in the mass market for both DSP and analog
catalog components, as these products continue to penetrate new applications and
markets. In the hard disk drive (HDD) market, unit demand is expected to
continue to grow, while pricing pressures may restrict HDD component revenue
growth, accelerating semiconductor integration. TI should benefit from this
acceleration due to its strong leadership in the HDD market, and ability to
integrate its broad portfolio of digital and analog HDD semiconductors.
SEMICONDUCTOR
Semiconductor revenues of $1883 million climbed 23 percent from the second
quarter of 1998, and were up 13 percent from the first quarter of 1999,
primarily due to increased shipments across a breadth of products, and to a
lesser extent, increased royalties.
DSP revenues were up 23 percent from the year-ago quarter, primarily due to
increases in the wireless and mass markets. DSP revenues were up 8 percent from
the first quarter of 1999, primarily due to gains in HDD and wireless. Analog
revenues increased 14 percent from the year-ago quarter, and were up 8 percent
from the first quarter of 1999, primarily due to wireless, and to a lesser
extent, the mass market.
Revenues for TI's remaining semiconductor products, in the aggregate, increased
from both the year-ago quarter and the first quarter of 1999. These
semiconductors represent a broad range of products, including standard logic,
application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs), microcontrollers, and reduced
instruction-set computing (RISC) microprocessors.
Semiconductor operating margin for the quarter was 25.7 percent, versus 24.9
percent in the year-ago quarter. Operating margin was up 5.4 percentage points
from
11
12
the first quarter of 1999, primarily due to increased product shipments, and to
a lesser extent, the catch-up royalty payment from Hyundai.
Semiconductor orders were strong, increasing 46 percent from the year-ago
quarter, primarily due to increased demand for DSP and analog products, and
increasing 11 percent sequentially, primarily due to increased customer demand
across substantially all products.
For the first six months of 1999, semiconductor revenues of $3556 million were
up $423 million from the first six months of 1998, primarily due to increased
shipments in DSP and analog, and to a lesser extent, increased royalties.
Operating margin of 23.2 percent was about flat with the year-ago period.
Semiconductor orders for the first six months were up 32 percent from the first
half of 1998, primarily due to increased demand for DSP and analog products.
During the quarter, TI made good progress in expanding the use of DSPs into new
applications and markets. In the Internet audio market, TI teamed with Liquid
Audio, Inc., the Fraunhofer Institute for Integrated Circuits and SanDisk Corp.
to offer the first complete solution for secure downloading of music off the
Internet onto digital personal audio players. Earlier in the quarter, Thomson
Consumer Electronics (marketer of RCA home entertainment products), and
separately Lucent Technologies and eDigital, announced the development of TI
DSP-based personal audio players.
For the DSL market, TI announced two next-generation ADSL chipsets: the
industry's first central office chipset that leverages a single DSP to support
four full-rate or G.lite ADSL lines, and a new highly integrated solution for
customer premise equipment such as modems and remote access routers.
TI also strengthened its product offerings with a number of new analog and DSP
products. In the quarter, TI introduced a record 59 analog catalog products,
which included data converters and power management devices optimized to work
with TI DSPs. TI introduced the 'C6203 DSP with an unprecedented combination of
speed, performance and integration to drive multichannel, multifunction
applications like third-generation (3G) wireless base stations and
telecommunications infrastructure. Eight out of the top ten wireless base
station manufacturers have designed this DSP into their 3G systems. TI also
announced the industry's first 1.2-volt catalog DSP, from the 'C5000 family,
that will significantly extend the battery life for applications such as hearing
aids and portable wireless devices.
MATERIALS & CONTROLS (M&C)
Revenues for the M&C business were $256 million, up 5 percent from the second
quarter of 1998, and up 4 percent sequentially, primarily due to strong global
market demand in automotive sensors. Operating margin was 16.6 percent, up from
the 15.1 percent of the year-ago quarter, due about equally to continued gains
from M&C's best-cost producer strategy and increased product shipments.
For the first half of 1999, revenues were up slightly from a year ago, and
operating margin was up 1.5 percentage points, primarily due to gains in the
best-cost producer strategy.
During the quarter, the business announced the acquisition of Integrated Sensor
Solutions, Inc., with the transaction expected to close in the third quarter.
The acquisition will bring additional expertise and a broadened product
portfolio to strengthen M&C's position in the automotive sensors market.
12
13
EDUCATIONAL & PRODUCTIVITY SOLUTIONS (E&PS)
Revenues for the E&PS business were $153 million, down 7 percent from the second
quarter of 1998, primarily due to shifting purchasing patterns from second
quarter to third quarter, as some major customers further align with
back-to-school schedules. Revenues were up 89 percent from the first quarter of
1999, reflecting the seasonal pattern. Operating margin was 28.1 percent, up
significantly from the year-ago quarter's 22.4 percent, reflecting ongoing
improvements in operating costs.
For the first half of 1999, revenues were $234 million, down slightly from the
same period a year ago. Operating margin was up 6.7 percentage points from a
year ago, reflecting improvements in operating costs.
DIGITAL IMAGING
Revenues in digital imaging increased from the year-ago quarter, due to
increased demand for Digital Micromirror Device(TM) (DMD) chipsets for portable
projectors. Loss from operations for the quarter continued at about the same
level as the year-ago quarter.
ADDITIONAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
For the first six months of 1999, TI's revenues were $4385 million, up from the
$4353 million in the first half of 1998; operating margin was 17.2 percent, up
18.6 percentage points; income was $567 million, up $504 million; and EPS was
$1.40, compared with $0.16. These changes were due to the absence of losses from
the now divested memory business, and to a lesser extent, about equally due to
the non-recurrence of a special charge associated with a worldwide restructuring
of support functions and consolidation of manufacturing operations, and a
special charge associated with the dissolution of the company's DRAM joint
venture with Hitachi.
Excluding special items: operating margin for the first six months of 1999 was
18.8 percent, compared with 9.2 percent in the year-ago period; income was $631
million, compared with $318 million; and EPS were $1.55, compared with $0.79.
Results for the first quarter of 1999 included special charges of $24 million,
primarily for a consolidation of semiconductor manufacturing operations in
Japan. Last year's first quarter results included a special charge of $219
million for discontinuing a DRAM manufacturing joint venture with Hitachi, Ltd.,
and $25 million for purchased in-process R&D. Additional information relating
to these charges appears under the heading "Special Charges and Gains." Special
items for the second quarters of 1998 and 1999 were referenced earlier in this
report.
During the first six months of 1999, cash and cash equivalents plus short-term
investments decreased by $506 million to $1743 million. The acquisitions of
Butterfly VLSI, Ltd. and Libit Signal Processing Ltd. required approximately
$382 million of cash in the first half of 1999. The sale of the Micron
subordinated note and other securities generated $172 million of cash.
Cash flow from operating activities was $526 million in the first half of 1999.
Capital expenditures totaled $505 million in the first six months of 1999,
compared to $698 million in the first half of 1998, which included the divested
memory business. Capital expenditures totaled $302 million in the second quarter
of 1999 versus $314 million in the year-ago quarter. Capital expenditures
continue to be projected at about $1.3 billion for the year. Including
in-process R&D from acquisitions, R&D totaled $666 million in the first six
months of 1999, compared to $634 million in the first half of 1998. R&D totaled
$359 million in the second quarter, versus $306 million in the
13
14
year-ago quarter. R&D is now projected to increase to about $1.3 billion for the
year, due to the increased R&D from acquisitions, up from the previous $1.2
billion estimate.
Depreciation for the first half of 1999 was $461 million, compared to $583
million in the same time period a year ago. Depreciation for the second quarter
of 1999 was $236 million, versus $308 million in the year-ago quarter.
Depreciation for 1999 continues to be projected at $1.0 billion.
During the first half of 1999, TI continued to purchase shares of common stock
as part of its program to reduce the potential dilutive effect of shares to be
issued under employee stock options. TI spent $151 million of cash for share
purchases net of proceeds from sales and other common stock transactions.
The income tax rate, excluding the effect of the second quarter 1999
non-deductible acquisition-related R&D charge, was 32 percent, which is the
estimated rate for the full year.
At the end of the second quarter, the debt-to-total capital ratio was .15 versus
.17 at the end of 1998.
SPECIAL CHARGES AND GAINS
Second Quarter of 1999
In connection with TI's acquisition of Libit Signal Processing Ltd. (Libit) in
the second quarter of 1999, TI recorded a charge of $52 million for the value of
purchased in-process R&D (purchased R&D) at the acquisition date, based upon the
appraised value of the related developmental projects. The purchased R&D
projects were assessed, analyzed and valued within the context and framework
articulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Libit's research and development relates to silicon solutions and complex system
level internet telephony software used in cable modems, cable set-top boxes,
cable head-ends and digital television products, which empower high-speed
internet access.
Significant assumptions used in determining the value of purchased R&D for Libit
included projected operating cash flows and the discount rate. Projected
operating cash flows were expected to begin in 2000. The discount rate selected
for Libit's in-process technologies was 22 percent.
At the time of the acquisition, June 30, 1999, Libit management estimated the
remaining cost and time to complete the purchased R&D projects was $5 million
and 492 engineer-months. The term "engineer-month" refers to the average amount
of research work expected to be performed by an engineer in a month. TI expects
to essentially meet its original return expectations.
The relative stage of completion and projected operating cash flows of the
underlying in-process projects acquired were the most significant and uncertain
assumptions utilized in the valuation analysis of the in-process research and
development. Such uncertainties could give rise to unforeseen budget over-runs
and/or revenue shortfalls in the event that TI is unable to successfully
complete and commercialize the projects. TI management is primarily responsible
for estimating the value of the purchased R&D in all acquisitions accounted for
under the purchase method.
14
15
First Quarter of 1999
In the first quarter of 1999, the company announced a consolidation of
semiconductor manufacturing operations in Japan to improve manufacturing
efficiencies and reduce costs. This action resulted in a pretax charge of $14
million in the first quarter, of which $13 million was for severance for the
elimination of 153 jobs in Hatogaya, Japan, and $1 million for other related
costs. At June 30, 1999, the pay-out of the severance cost obligation had not
yet begun. Of the $14 million charge, $11 million was included in cost of
revenues and $3 million in marketing, general and administrative expense. The
primary benefit from this consolidation action was reduced people costs, which
were estimated to reach $11 million annually. The benefit was expected to begin
in the fourth quarter of 1999.
In connection with TI's acquisition of Butterfly VLSI, Ltd. (Butterfly) in the
first quarter of 1999, TI recorded a charge of $10 million for the value of
purchased in-process R&D (purchased R&D) at the acquisition date, based upon the
appraised value of the related developmental projects. The purchased R&D
projects were assessed, analyzed and valued within the context and framework
articulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Butterfly's research and development relates to short distance wireless
semiconductor and systems technology. This technology is used to achieve higher
data rates at 2.4 GHz and above frequencies for use in voice-plus-data
transmission products.
Significant assumptions used in determining the value of purchased R&D for
Butterfly included projected operating cash flows and the discount rate.
Projected operating cash flows were expected to begin in 2000. The discount rate
selected for Butterfly's in-process technologies was 25%.
At the time of the acquisition, Butterfly management estimated the remaining
cost and time to complete the purchased R&D projects to be $5 million and 264
engineer-months. The term "engineer-month" refers to the average amount of
research work expected to be performed by an engineer in a month. At June 30,
1999, based on the latest available information, the estimated cost and time to
complete the in-process projects was approximately $8 million and 575
engineer-months. TI expects to essentially meet its original return
expectations.
The relative stage of completion and projected operating cash flows of the
underlying in-process projects acquired were the most significant and uncertain
assumptions utilized in the valuation analysis of the in-process research and
development. Such uncertainties could give rise to unforeseen budget over-runs
and/or revenue shortfalls in the event that TI is unable to successfully
complete and commercialize the projects. TI management is primarily responsible
for estimating the value of the purchased R&D in all acquisitions accounted for
under the purchase method.
Second Quarter of 1998
In the second quarter of 1998, the company announced that, as a result of the
various business divestitures over the past several years, the pending sale of
its memory business (subsequently completed in September 1998), and weakness at
that time in the semiconductor market environment, it was implementing a
severance/manufacturing efficiency program in order to more closely match the
size and cost of its support functions with the company's overall size and to
further combine manufacturing resources for more efficient operations. The
primary benefit from this severance /manufacturing efficiency program was
reduced people costs; total benefits were estimated to reach $270 million
annually. The benefit was expected to begin in the third quarter of 1998.
15
16
The program, which primarily affected the company's corporate activities and
semiconductor business, included the elimination of 3,441 jobs around the world
through voluntary programs, attrition, outsourcing and layoffs, as well as the
closing of several facilities. As a result, the company took a pretax charge of
$219 million in the second quarter of 1998, of which $126 million was included
in marketing, general and administrative expense and $93 million in cost of
revenues. Of the $219 million charge, $161 million was for severance, $41
million for asset write-downs and $17 million for vendor cancellation and lease
charges.
Of the $41 million for asset write-downs, $25 million was for U.S. semiconductor
inventories and $16 million was for fixed assets, primarily accelerated
depreciation on assets phased out during 1998 in connection with the winding
down of production at a semiconductor manufacturing facility located in
Singapore. The primary benefits from this consolidation action were increased
efficiencies and reduced manufacturing costs. Estimated savings from such
actions were approximately $9 million annually. The benefit was expected to
begin in the fourth quarter of 1998.
Of the $17 million for vendor cancellation and lease charges, $15 million was
for required vendor fees for cancellation of purchase contracts for chemicals,
supplies and equipment as a result of a U.S. facility shutdown.
At June 30, 1999, the program had essentially been completed, with most
severance costs paid except for $22 million, which will primarily be paid by the
end of 1999. Of the 3,441 jobs, 3,381 had been eliminated, and 60 will be
eliminated by the end of 1999.
In the second quarter of 1998, the company sold its shares in the TI-Acer DRAM
semiconductor manufacturing joint venture to Acer Corporation for $120 million
in cash. This sale resulted in a pretax gain of $83 million, included in other
income.
First Quarter of 1998
In the first quarter of 1998, the company's U.S. DRAM semiconductor
manufacturing joint venture with Hitachi, Ltd. was discontinued as a result of
a combination of severe price declines and overcapacity in the DRAM market. As
a part of this first quarter discontinuance, TI purchased the assets of the
venture for approximately $98 million. Also as part of this first quarter
discontinuance, TI and Hitachi decided to assume and share equally in the
payment of the venture's obligations. TI's share of those payments was $219
million, which was paid and charged to cost of revenues in the first quarter.
In connection with TI's acquisitions of GO DSP and Spectron, both of which
occurred in the first quarter of 1998, TI recorded charges of $10 million and
$15 million for purchased in-process R&D (purchased R&D), based upon the
appraised value of the related developmental projects. The Income Approach,
which included an analysis of the markets, cash flows, and risks associated with
achieving such cash flows, was the primary technique utilized in valuing each
purchased R&D project.
16
17
GO DSP's and Spectron's research and development related to DSP software tools.
These software tools, which include real-time operating systems (RTOS), allow
DSP systems developers to improve productivity and reduce time-to-market. TI's
goal in these acquisitions was to extend its leadership in digital signal
processing solutions by offering a complete development environment, simplifying
DSP development, and making TI DSP solutions even more attractive for a broad
range of fast-growing markets.
Significant assumptions used in determining the value of purchased R&D for GO
DSP and Spectron included projected operating cash flows and the discount rate.
Projected operating cash flows were expected to begin in late 1998. The discount
rate selected for GO DSP's and Spectron's in-process technologies was 30%.
At the time of the acquisitions, GO DSP and Spectron management estimated the
remaining cost and time to complete the purchased R&D projects was approximately
$7 million and 540 engineer-months. The term "engineer-month" refers to the
average amount of research work expected to be performed by an engineer in a
month. All the in-process projects were essentially completed on schedule. TI
expects to essentially meet its original return expectations.
The relative stage of completion and projected operating cash flows of the
underlying in-process projects acquired were the most significant and uncertain
assumptions utilized in the valuation analysis of the in-process research and
development. Uncertainties regarding projected operating cash flows could give
rise to unforeseen budget over-runs and/or revenue shortfalls in the event that
TI is unable to successfully commercialize the projects. TI management is
primarily responsible for estimating the value of the purchased R&D in all
acquisitions accounted for under the purchase method.
YEAR 2000
Since 1995, TI has been actively engaged in addressing Year 2000 (Y2K) issues.
These result from the use of two-digit, rather than four-digit, year dates in
software, a practice which could cause date-sensitive systems to malfunction or
fail because they may not recognize or process date information correctly.
State of Readiness: To manage its Y2K program, TI has divided its efforts into
four program areas:
Information Technology (computer hardware, software and electronic data
interchange (EDI) interfaces);
Physical Plant (manufacturing equipment and facilities);
Products (including product development); and
Extended Enterprise (suppliers and customers).
For each of these program areas, TI has used a four-step approach:
Ownership (creating awareness, assigning tasks);
Inventory (listing items to be assessed for Y2K readiness);
Assessment (prioritizing the inventoried items, assessing their Y2K readiness,
planning corrective actions, making initial contingency plans); and
Corrective Action Deployment (implementing corrective actions, verifying
implementation, finalizing contingency plans).
At June 30, 1999, the Ownership, Inventory, Assessment and Corrective Action
Deployment steps were essentially complete for priority items in each of the
four program areas. TI considers priority items to be those that could
significantly disrupt TI's business operations.
Further discussion of the status as of June 30, 1999, by program area follows:
17
18
Information Technology: Corrective actions have been deployed for substantially
all of TI's legacy business strategic information systems (manufacturing,
marketing, financial and human resources). In the ordinary course of business,
TI continues to install new business systems as appropriate. Verification of Y2K
readiness is incorporated into the process of implementing these new systems.
Corrective action deployment of infrastructure hardware and software that
support TI's enterprise-wide networks and servers is essentially complete. TI
has also deployed an assessment tool and corrective action process for desktop
computers. TI's EDI interfaces have been tested with major customers and
suppliers, and TI believes that those interfaces are Y2K ready.
Physical Plant: Corrective action deployment for manufacturing equipment and
facilities is essentially complete.
Products: TI is essentially complete with the Y2K readiness assessment of its
products and is providing product status information on its company web site.
Divested product lines were not part of this assessment. The effort has included
semiconductor devices sold within the past five years. TI's assessment indicates
that the majority of semiconductor products either have no date logic or are
programmable devices that require customer assessment of any software and
firmware or other elements added by or at the request of TI's customers. The
likelihood and extent of Y2K problems relating to devices that require customer
assessment are unknown. TI has identified date-related issues with certain of
TI's semiconductor application software development tools and is providing
corrective software patches. The company believes these development tool issues
are unlikely to cause significant problems for TI customers. Assessment of
products of the Materials & Controls, Educational & Productivity Solutions, and
Digital Light Processing businesses indicates they are either Y2K ready or have
no date logic.
Extended Enterprise: TI's Y2K supplier program has attempted to assess the
readiness of TI suppliers, focusing on those that could significantly disrupt
TI's business operations. TI began contacting its suppliers in 1997 to assess
their readiness. This effort has included sending Y2K surveys and conducting
onsite Y2K reviews with selected suppliers. TI's assessment of its critical
suppliers is essentially complete, and contingency plans have been developed for
those suppliers that were not assessed Y2K ready by June 30. TI also has
discussed Y2K status with selected strategic customers.
Other Activities: TI continues to review Y2K issues relating to its information
technology, physical plant, products, suppliers and customers. As noted above,
TI has developed a set of contingency plans as of June 30, 1999 on the basis of
information available as of that time. It will refine those plans and implement
them as needed in response to further information gathered through the end of
the year. In addition, TI intends to take actions to verify and maintain its Y2K
readiness and finalize its year-end operating plan (for example, its plan for
staffing to address Y2K issues that arise during the transition to 2000).
Costs to Address Y2K Issues: TI's estimated aggregate costs for its Y2K
activities from 1995 through 2000 are expected to range from $65 million to $75
million. Through June 30, 1999, TI has spent approximately $60 million.
Risks of Y2K Issues and Contingency Plans: TI's contingency planning process is
intended to mitigate worst-case business disruptions. TI believes that its most
reasonably likely worst-case Y2K scenario would relate to disruption of supply
from third parties as a result of Y2K problems experienced by those parties or
their suppliers. TI's manufacturing, sales and service operations are dependent
on an ongoing supply of infrastructure services (such as electricity, water and
telecommunication services), materials and equipment spare parts from third
parties as well as third-party transportation services. In many cases, TI
depends on a limited number of suppliers for those services
18
19
and materials. A disruption in supply could interrupt manufacturing operations
and result in damage to work as well as delays in product deliveries to
customers. These results could affect TI revenues and lead to claims by
customers against the company. As part of contingency planning to address these
risks, TI is considering alternatives such as the creation of buffer inventories
of critical supplies and identification of alternative suppliers.
TI customers may experience Y2K disruptions that affect the quantity or timing
of their orders to TI or their ability to make timely payment. If these
disruptions occur, TI revenues and cash flow may be affected. TI cannot predict
the likelihood of these disruptions or the extent of their impact on TI. It is
unknown whether customers will change their spending patterns in preparation for
the Year 2000 (for example, by accelerating or delaying orders).
Certain discontinued products and divested product lines present Y2K issues. In
the event of product failure, these issues could expose TI to product liability
or other types of claims. It is difficult to predict the extent of potential
liability. However, for several reasons, TI does not expect these issues to
result in any claim that will have a material effect on its results of
operations. The reasons include the age of the products (resulting in many being
retired from service or upgraded before the Year 2000), expiration of applicable
warranty periods, widespread customer awareness of Y2K risks, and the efforts of
TI and the acquirers of its divested product lines to alert customers to Y2K
issues affecting the products. TI continues to review legal risks that may be
associated with discontinued products and divested product lines.
The preceding Year 2000 disclosure is designated a "Year 2000 Readiness
Disclosure" under the Year 2000 Information and Readiness Disclosure Act.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
Information concerning market risk is contained on pages 38 and 39 of the
Registrant's 1998 annual report to stockholders and is incorporated by reference
to such annual report.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.
Beginning May 1, 1998, TI filed lawsuits in United States District Courts in
Texas and in courts in the United Kingdom, The Netherlands, France, Germany and
Japan against Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd. or related entities
(collectively, "Hyundai") seeking injunctive relief for alleged infringement of
over a dozen of TI's patents relating to the manufacture and sale of
semiconductor devices, including DRAMs. Hyundai responded by filing lawsuits in
United States District Courts in Texas and Delaware, seeking injunctive relief
against TI for alleged infringement of Hyundai's patents relating to the
manufacture and sale of semiconductor devices, including DRAMs.
Following a jury finding of willful infringement by Hyundai, on May 23, 1999, TI
announced it had signed a 10-year cross-license agreement with Hyundai. With the
new cross-license agreement, all remaining litigation between TI and Hyundai was
settled.
19
20
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
At the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 22, 1999, the stockholders
voted upon the election of directors.
The board nominees were elected as directors with the following vote:
Nominee For Withheld
------- --- --------
James R. Adams 298,445,909 43,252,252
David L. Boren 298,405,327 43,292,834
James B. Busey IV 298,349,073 43,349,088
Daniel A. Carp 298,414,489 43,283,672
Thomas J. Engibous 298,302,058 43,396,103
Gerald W. Fronterhouse 298,258,296 43,439,865
David R. Goode 298,351,750 43,346,411
Wayne R. Sanders 298,427,503 43,270,658
Gloria M. Shatto 298,407,181 43,290,980
Clayton K. Yeutter 298,393,334 43,304,827
ITEM 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) Exhibits
Designation of
Exhibits in
this Report Description of Exhibit
-------------- ---------------------------
11 Computation of Basic and
Diluted Earnings Per Common
and Dilutive Potential
Common Share
12 Computation of Ratio of
Earnings to Fixed
27 Financial Data Schedule
(b) Report on Form 8-K
The Registrant filed the following report on Form 8-K with the Securities
and Exchange Commission during the quarter ended June 30, 1999: Form 8-K, dated
May 24, 1999, which included a news release regarding the signing of a
cross-license agreement with Hyundai Electronics Industries Co., Ltd.
"Safe Harbor" Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995:
The Form 10-Q includes "forward-looking statements" intended to qualify for the
safe harbor from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally can be identified
by phrases such as TI or its management "believes," "expects," "anticipates,"
"foresees," "forecasts," "estimates" or other words or phrases of similar
import. Similarly, such statements herein that describe the company's business
strategy, outlook, objectives, plans, intentions or goals also are
forward-looking statements. All such forward-looking statements are subject to
certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in forward-looking statements.
20
21
We urge you to carefully consider the following important factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations of the company
or its management:
- Market demand for semiconductors, particularly for digital signal
processors and analog chips in key markets, such as telecommunications and
computers;
- TI's ability to develop, manufacture and market innovative products in a
rapidly changing technological environment;
- TI's ability to compete in products and prices in an intensely
competitive industry;
- TI's ability to maintain and enforce a strong intellectual property
portfolio and obtain needed licenses from third parties;
- Timely completion by customers and suppliers of their Year 2000 programs,
accurate assessment of TI's Year 2000 readiness and of risks associated
with its current and past products, and effective implementation of
contingency plans and corrective actions;
- Timely completion of announced acquisitions;
- Global economic, social and political conditions in the countries in which
TI and its customers and suppliers operate, including fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates;
- Losses or curtailments of purchases from key customers;
- TI's ability to recruit and retain skilled personnel;
- Availability of raw materials and critical manufacturing equipment;
- Realization of savings from announced restructuring efforts and
consolidation of manufacturing operations.
For a more detailed discussion of these factors, see the text under the heading
"Cautionary Statements Regarding Future Operations" in Item 1 of the company's
Form 10-K for 1998. The forward-looking statements included in the Form 10-Q are
made only as of the date of the Form 10-Q and the company undertakes no
obligation to publicly update the forward-looking statements to reflect
subsequent events or circumstances.
Trademarks: Digital Micromirror Device, Digital Light Processing and DLP are
trademarks of Texas Instruments.
21
22
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
BY: /s/ WILLIAM A. AYLESWORTH
---------------------------------------
William A. Aylesworth
Senior Vice President
Treasurer and
Chief Financial Officer
Date: August 13, 1999
23
EXHIBIT INDEX
DESIGNATION OF PAPER (P)
EXHIBITS IN OR
THIS REPORT DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT ELECTRONIC (E)
- ---------------- ----------------------- --------------
11 Computation of Basic and Diluted E
Earnings Per Common and Dilutive
Potential Common Share
12 Computation of Ratio of E
Earnings to Fixed Charges
27 Financial Data Schedule E
1
EXHIBIT 11
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
EARNINGS PER COMMON AND DILUTIVE POTENTIAL COMMON SHARE
For Three Months Ended For Six Months Ended
---------------------- ----------------------
June 30 June 30 June 30 June 30
1999 1998 1999 1998
-------- -------- -------- --------
Net income (in millions) ........................................... $ 323 $ 52 $ 567 $ 63
======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted earnings per common and dilutive potential common share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands) .......... 392,623 391,004 392,122 390,398
Weighted average dilutive potential common shares:
Stock option and compensation plans ............................ 13,446 10,889 13,100 10,447
-------- -------- -------- --------
Weighted average common and dilutive potential common shares ....... 406,069 401,893 405,222 400,845
======== ======== ======== ========
Diluted earnings per common share .................................. $ 0.80 $ 0.13 $ 1.40 $ 0.16
======== ======== ======== ========
Basic earnings per common share:
Weighted average common shares outstanding (in thousands) .......... 392,623 391,004 392,122 390,398
======== ======== ======== ========
Basic earnings per common share .................................... $ 0.82 $ 0.13 $ 1.45 $ 0.16
======== ======== ======== ========
1
EXHIBIT 12
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
(Dollars in millions)
For Six Months
Ended June 30
------------------
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1998 1999
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes and fixed charges:
Income before extraordinary item and
interest expense on loans,
capitalized interest amortized,
and provision for income taxes ....... $ 943 $1,530 $ 65 $ 825 $ 710 $ 140 $ 904
Add interest attributable to
rental and lease expense ............. 40 41 44 44 41 20 19
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
$ 983 $1,571 $ 109 $ 869 $ 751 $ 160 $ 923
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Fixed charges:
Total interest on loans (expensed
and capitalized) ....................... $ 58 $ 69 $ 108 $ 114 $ 85 $ 43 $ 40
Interest attributable to rental
and lease expense ...................... 40 41 44 44 41 20 19
------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------ ------
Fixed charges .............................. $ 98 $ 110 $ 152 $ 158 $ 126 $ 63 $ 59
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ......... 10.0 14.3 * 5.5 6.0 2.5 15.6
====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ====== ======
* Not meaningful. The coverage deficiency was $43 million in 1996.
5
1,000,000
6-MOS
DEC-31-1999
JUN-30-1999
334
1,409
1,749
61
689
4,821
6,626
3,219
11,047
2,078
960
0
0
394
6,327
11,047
4,385
4,385
2,307
2,307
666
0
37
859
292
567
0
0
0
567
1.45
1.40
